HomeThe BevillesEastern ShoreAmerindiansAmerindian DNA ProjectAnne Marie DNADoucet DNABroome DNACajun DNAContact Us!
Marie Rundquist Compares Autosomal DNA Test Results and Analysis
 (STR, SNP, mtDNA)
27-marker autosomal test results reveal, when analyzed against referenced population data, (and cross-referencing other tools, databases, and methods), a strong MLI (Match Likelihood Index) scores for Native American Ancestry, and a much lower-than-expected MLI score for Northwestern European ancestry, continuing a pattern of unexpected Native American DNA results received from National Geographic, Family Tree DNA, and now, DNA Tribes. Visit DNA Tribes and Kerchner's DNA Tribes Test Log for More Information. (Updated January, 2011).

My Actual DNA Tribes Analysis Results - Native Match Strong/Strongest and Respective MLIs were:
Crete, Greece (0.13) 69.78; Korcula, Croatia (0.09) 69.50; Uzbek (Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.25) 56.87; Sassari and Orgosolo, Sardinia (0.1) 48.11; Toscana, Italy (0.07) 28.58; Sweden (0.05) 28.05; Norway (0.06) 27.39; Kazakh (Northwest Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.27) 26.85; Komi (Russian Federation) (0.16)24.13; Norway (0.06) 22.81; Sweden (0.04) 22.70; Sweden (0.04) 22.05; Purepecha (Tarascan) (Zipiajo, Mexico) (Mountain area) (0.01)21.95; Kirgiz (Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.09)21.46; Austria (0.06) 19.89; Slovenia (0.04)19.87; Turkey (0.06) 19.43; Schleswig-Holstein, Germany (0.04)18.94; Bashkir (Russian Federation) (0.2) 18.56; Italy (0.05) 17.95

My Actual DNA Tribes Analysis Results - Global Match Strong/Strongest and Respective MLIs were:
Southwest Andean Region, Colombia (0.5)1,353.87; Hispanic (U.S.A.) (0.54)1,173.65; Risaralda, Colombia (0.44) 1,095.36; Mestizo (Guatemala) (0.31) 1,080.20; Mestizo (Ecuador) (0.47)943.41; Central Andean Region, Colombia (0.46)799.23; Native American (mixed) (Minnesota, U.S.A.) (0.31)739.11; Caldas, Colombia (0.38) 694.46; El Salvador (0.34) 601.41; Costa Rica (0.44)579.01; Mestizo (Nicaragua) (0.34)465.37; Costa Rica (0.32)453.82; Colombia (0.41)422.42; Mestizo (Ecuador) (0.28)414.86; Hispanic (California, U.S.A.)(0.33)332.20; Hispanic (U.S.A.) (0.29)320.60; Native American (mixed) (Minnesota, U.S.A.) (0.22)320.45; Mestizo (Ecuador) (0.21) 291.85; Mestizo (Honduras) (0.48)269.01; Mestizo (La Paz and Santa Cruz, Bolivia)(0.14)256.99

My Actual DNA Tribes Analysis Results - World Region Match Strong/Strongest and Respective MLIs were:
Mestizo (0.51)515.52; Altaian (0.55)159.18; Central American (0.01) 23.98; Finnic (0.06)16.61; Northwest European (0.04)10.47; Mediterranean (0.03)6.52; Mesopotamian (0.03)4.38; Eastern European (0.02)3.98; Levantine (0.02)2.77; Mexican (0) 2.55; Aegean (0.02) 2.43; North India (0.01)1.28; North African(0.01)0.96; Arabian (0) 0.69; Mayan (0)0.64; Manchurian (0)0.51; Malay Archipelago (0) 0.44; South India (0)0.38; Horn of Africa (0) 0.34; Arctic (0) 0.32; Andean (0) 0.23; Athabaskan (0) 0.11; Gran Chaco (0) 0.07; North Amerindian (0) 0.06; Eastern India (0) 0.06; Australian (0) 0.05; Japanese (0) 0.03; Chinese (0) 0.03; Patagonian (0)0.03 From DNAT: "Mestizo ("mixed"): Native Americans who have blended with Europeans and (to a lesser degree) Africans in recent history. This blending is most typical of Latin American Mestizo peoples, but can also be found in English and French speaking populations of North America (Metis)." 

Comments:
I was shocked at how low my Northwest European MLI has proved to be, verified through DNA testing. This low Northwest European percentage, shown in the World Region Match, refutes any prior assumptions of a my having a primarily Western European genetic composition, despite my having a Native American mtDNA result. Response from DNAT when I inquired about percentage of Native American ancestry shown in my test: "Results for your DNA profile are most consistent with approximately 1/2 Native American ancestry..." As I have already researched my mother's Amerindian lines,and since receiving these results, I have now re-visited my father's last recorded genealogy and have derived that the last locale of my father's earliest paternal ancestor was an 1800s Seneca Indian Reservation in New York, where I find his surname, and given name listed among others. Based on these significant DNA results, I can only assess that my father, like my mother, had hidden Native American ancestry. DNAT adds: "...Results indicate that the Native American regions where your own DNA profile is most frequent are the Central American, Mexican, and Mayan regions. These regions are associated with the early development of maize (corn) growing civilizations, which spread from Mesoamerica to more distant parts of North and South America (including traditional Six Nations lands of the eastern US and Canada)." Also from DNAT: "Modern Turkic speaking populations of the Altaian region share genetic characteristics with East Asian, European, and to a degree Native American populations. These links most likely reflect ancient contacts across the Bering Strait and links with the ancestors of Native American populations." In addition to consulting the references, I plan to visit the site of the 1800s Seneca Indian Reservation and hopefully discover more about my father's family as I have learned about my mother's. I had never expected to find that I had such a clear pattern of Native American ancestry demonstrated on both my father's and my mother's sides -- let alone a tribal affiliation in the United States.

Native American Tribal Panel with MLI (Strongest at the Top)

Purepecha (Tarascan) (Zipiajo, Mexico) (Mountain area) (0.01) 21.95
Purepecha (Tarascan) (Angahuan, Mexico) (Valley) (0)  3.25
Otomi (La Sierra Madre Oriental, Mexico) (0.01)  2.69
Hna Hnu (Otomi) (Hidalgo, Mexico) (0.01)  1.65
Tiriyo (Brazil) (0.01)  0.97
Otomi (Ixmiquilpan Valley, Mexico) (0)  0.64
Athabaskan (Alaska) (0.01) 0.60
Chol Maya (Northeast Chiapas, Mexico) (0)  0.30
Triqui (Mixteca, Oaxaca, Mexico) (0) 0.29
Quechua (Ecuador) (0)  0.29
Sioux and Chippewa (Minnesota, U.S.A.) (0) 0.14
Pipil (Panchimalco, El Salvador) (0) 0.13
Yucatan Mayan (Yucatan, Mexico) (0) 0.11
Maya (Merida, Yucatan, Mexico) (0) 0.07
Aymara and Mestizo (La Paz, Bolivia) (0) 0.03
Huastec (Nahualt) (La Huasteco, Mexico) (0)0.02
Sioux and Chippewa (Minnesota, U.S.A.) (0) 0.01
Yukpa (Northern Colombia) (0) 0.01
Cree (Kenistenoag) (Saskatchewan, Canada) (0) 0.01
Kakchikel Mayan (Guatemala) (0) 0.01

Europa Panel with MLI (Strongest at the Top)

Urals (0.13)22.85
Norse (0.05) 19.12
Finnic (0.06) 16.61
Germanic (0.03) 9.83
Celtic (0.03)9.59
Belgic (0.03) 7.54
Balkan (0.02) 6.42
Portuguese (0.02) 6.41
Italian (0.03)5.96
Greek (0.03) 5.57
Spanish (0.01) 3.22
Basque (0.01)  2.15
Polish (0.01)1.86
Ashkenazic (0) 0.54
Scythian (0)0.46
Thracian (0)0.38
Russian (0)0.36

Central Asian
Panel with MLI (Strongest at the Top)

Uzbek (Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.25)  56.87
Kazakh (Northwest Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.27)  26.85
Komi (Russian Federation) (0.16) 24.13
Kirgiz (Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.09)21.46
Bashkir (Russian Federation) (0.2)18.56
Altaian-Kizhi (0.17)14.25
Hazara (Pakistan) (0.58)10.16
Altai (Altai Republic) (0.14)6.22
Udmurt (Russian Federation) (0.06)4.06
Tatar-Mishary (Russian Federation) (0.05)3.57
Tuva (0.07)2.15
Uyghur (Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.03)1.88
Mongolian (China) (0.01)1.37
Egyin Gol, Mongolia (0.02)1.25
Chuvash (Russian Federation) (0.02) 1.20
Mongolia (0.02) 1.16
Uyghur (Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0.01)  0.94
Central Anatolia (Turks, Kurds, and Cerkhez) (0.01)0.66
Hui (Ningxia, China) (0)0.29
Salar (Xunhua, Qinghai, China) (0)0.25
Eastern Anatolia, Turkey (0) 0.20
Mongol (Ximeng, Inner Mongolia) (0) 0.20
Roma (Eastern Hungary) (0) 0.14
Khamnigan Mongol (0.01) 0.12
Mongol (Wumeng, Inner Mongolia) (0) 0.09
Roma (Republic of Macedonia) (0)0.06
Tofalar (Irkutsk Oblast, Siberia) (0.01)0.05
Evenk (Harbin, Chinese Manchuria) (0)0.04
Aleut (Northeastern Siberia) (0.02)0.04
Uyghur (Chinese Turkestan) (0.01) 0.03
Dongxiang (Qinghai, China) (0) 0.03
East Mongolian (Inner Mongolia) (0)0.02
Xibe (Xinjiang, Chinese Turkestan) (0) 0.02
Roma (Greece) (0) 0.02
Salar (Qinghai, China) (0) 0.01
Roma (Eastern Slovakia) (0)0.01

 

Reference: http://www.nist.gov/mml/index.cfm; http://www.cstl.nist.gov/biotech/strbase/

 

 

FOR COMPARISON

 

I ran the 27 genetic markers received with my DNA Tribes analysis through EHSTRAFD for comparison purposes.

 

EHSTRAFD Results (values >= 1.0), Highest Ranking Match at the Top:

 

1.Mestizo [6.06295332329E-026] [100.00] Guatemala Guatemala GT-0001
2 Mestizo [5.55220216957E-026] [91.58] Central Mexico Mexico MX-0006
3 Serbian [2.83249845149E-026] [46.72] Novi Sad Serbia CS-0001
4 Iranian [1.9272082234E-026] [31.79] Dubai Emirate United Arab Emirates AE-0002
5 Salvadoran [1.76929602798E-026] [29.18] El Salvador El Salvador SV-0001
6 Omani [1.41013683886E-026] [23.26] Dubai Emirate United Arab Emirates AE-0002
7 Byelorussian [1.12199674377E-026] [18.51] North-Eastern Poland Poland PL-0017
8 Brazilian [6.63992217309E-027] [10.95] Minas Gerais Brazil BR-0010
9 Romanian [6.00674649668E-027] [9.91] Transylvania Romania RO-0006
10 Romanian [5.49351555797E-027] [9.06] Wallachia Romania RO-0007
11 Caucasian [3.88063725822E-027] [6.40] Transylvania Romania RO-0005
12 Albanian [3.18657720323E-027] [5.26] Kosovo Kosovo KO-0001
13 Filipino [2.79009740325E-027] [4.60] Philippines Philippines PH-0005
14 Romanian [2.53109963267E-027] [4.17] Dobruja Romania RO-0003
15 Polish [2.24194735334E-027] [3.70] North-Central Poland Poland PL-0019
16 Polish [2.12818850579E-027] [3.51] Lodz Poland PL-0023
17 Polish [1.52873994052E-027] [2.52] Northern Poland Poland PL-0018

 

Results returned by EHSTRAFD, for the same 27-markers (autosomal STRs) analyzed by DNA Tribes, reflect the same prominent "Mestizo" (describing where Native Americans have blended with other populations)/Russian/Mesoamerican/Asian matches as interpreted in the DNA Tribes analysis.

<< EHSTRAFD - Earth Human STR Allele Frequencies Database. c2009-2010 [cited on 20 Oct 2010 - R2]. Available from http://www.ehstrafd.org >>

The European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI) calculator, referencing the ENFSI DNA WG STR Population Database yielded the following:

CountryActual MatchingProbabilityBalding Size BiasCorrectionBalding & NicholsFSTNRC II Upper BoundConfidence Intervals
Croatia1.07E-0162.27E-0164.37E-0152.03E-015
Portugal1.32E-0163.98E-0166.43E-0155.92E-015
Full Database2.17E-0172.29E-0171.95E-0154.64E-017


With ENFSI, Croatia emerges as the strongest of Actual Matching Probability, with Portugal the next highest, among low European scores. 


DNA Tribes SNP analysis adds to a picture of ancestry:

For 17 World Regions Admixture Analysis (Updated August, 2011)


85.51 Atlantic European

12.11%  Baltic Urals
1.40% Meso American
0.66% Pakistani-Indus
0.31% Arctic


Notes: DNA Tribes had the following comment regarding SNP analysis (above):
In DNA Tribes SNP results for your genotype, the Mesoamerican contribution is larger than the Arctic contribution. Based on available data, this appears consistent with STR data that indicate substantial continuity among indigenous populations throughout most of the Americas. As new SNP data become available, it might become possible to clarify these results further.


Native American Population Similarities:


Maya Mexico 0.7135
Aymara La Paz Bolivia 0.7121
Totonac Mexico 0.7112
Eastern Greenland 0.7100
Pima Mexico 0.7034
Amerindian Colombia 0.7003
Karitiana Brazil 0.6946
Surui Brazil 0.6865
 


Other Americas-Diaspora Population Similarities


European‐American Utah 0.7576

Mexican-American 0.7409
Aleut Alaska 0.7408 
Puerto Rico 0.7492
Columbia 0.7470
Ecuador 0.7350
W. Greenland 0.7235
Chinese-American Denver 0.7102
African American SW USA 0.7085


European Population Similarities:


Great Britain (England and Scotland) 0.7575

France 0.7558
Finland 0.7556
Tuscany Italy 0.7556
Spain 0.7553
Slovenia 0.7550
Hungary 0.7545
Basque France 0.7540
Orkney Islands 0.7535
Vologda Russia 0.7534
Bergamo Italy 0.7521
Romania 0.7521
Sardinia 0.7520
Lithuania 0.7517
Belarus 0.7504
Armenian 0.7488
Turkey 0.7486
Lezgin Caucasus 0.7486
Georgia Caucasus 0.7485
Adyghe Russia‐Caucasus 0.7482
Dargin Urkarah Dagestan 0.7481
Chuvash Russian Federation 0.7477
Russia 0.7459
Kumyk Stalskoe Dagestan 0.7406
 

Mideast Population Similarities


Druze Israel‐Carmel 0.7488 
Cyprus 0.7479 
Palestinian Israel 0.7465 
Iran 0.7464 
Syria 0.7456 
Jordan 0.7448 
Bedouin Negev Desert Israel`0.7446 
Egypt (Sample 2) 0.7445 
Saudi Arabia 0.7434 
Egypt (Sample 1) 0.7402 

Lebanon 0.7393 
Yemen 0.7347 
Samaritan 0.7233


North Asian Population Similarities:


Uzbek Central Asia           0.7395
Hazara Pakistan              0.7349 
Kyrgyzstan                   0.7295 
Selkup Russian Federation    0.7277 
Yukaghir Russian Federation  0.7276
Altai Russian Federation 0.7241
Yakut Siberia 0.7168
Chukchi Russian Federation 0.7167
Evenk Russian Federation 0.7160

Nganasan Russian Federation 0.7134
Mongola China 0.7115
Koryak Russian Federation 0.7114 
Xibo China 0.7102 
Ket Russian Federation 0.7092
Hezhen China 0.7080
Daur China 0.7080
Oroqen China 0.7075

Click to view other SNP analysis